Dee Scritchfield
My feedback
-
38 votesDee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
355 votes
Hi everyone – As of 1/24/2017, we have released the new Appointment Report to all practices. This report allows practices to review and filter appointments by facility, status, provider, and date, making it easier to track cancellations, no shows, and other scheduling details.
You can read more about the new Appointment Report here:
http://knowledgebase.practicefusion.com/knowledgebase/articles/1124125
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
Dee Scritchfield
commented
This is basic oversight for any practice and a needed component for reporting. Breaking out appointments by type should be easy to program and it needed to see what our practice makeup is and where improvement or focus of attention needs to be
-
22 votes
We would like to hear from other members of our community on how they’d like to see this feature improved as well. Feel free to add your voice to this idea by commenting below. We are listening attentively to every request submitted by our customers.
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
331 votes
As of 12/14/2015, copay is now displayed as a column in the Scheduler.
You can read more about how to track copays here: http://knowledgebase.practicefusion.com/knowledgebase/articles/761493-how-can-i-track-copays-in-the-schedule
Dee Scritchfield
commented
It is a good feature but it needs work. There is a section that you can enter notes in but the data entered in the note section of the receipt does not show when you print it and this is the only place to put an authorization number from a credit card payment.
Also we need to run a report on money received daily broke out by payment type and this is not an option -
907 votes
Thanks for helping make the Practice Fusion EHR better for everyone. If you are passionate about this idea, remember you can let your colleagues know you support it by clicking the ‘Vote’ button.
The ideas with the most supporters are constantly being considered for addition to our roadmap in the future.
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
1,543 votesDee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
2,219 votes
Thanks for helping make the Practice Fusion EHR better for everyone. If you are passionate about this idea, remember you can let your colleagues know you support it by clicking the ‘Vote’ button.
The ideas with the most supporters are constantly being considered for addition to our roadmap in the future.
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
Dee Scritchfield
commented
This is so needed as well as an alert to say this is a duplicate patient so you dont create one in the first place.
-
1,231 votes
Thanks for helping make the Practice Fusion EHR better for everyone. If you are passionate about this idea, remember you can let your colleagues know you support it by clicking the ‘Vote’ button.
The ideas with the most supporters are constantly being considered for addition to our roadmap in the future.
Dee Scritchfield
commented
would be much more efficient
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
217 votes
Learn about the Billing Report here: https://knowledgebase.practicefusion.com/knowledgebase/articles/483045
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
371 votes
Thanks to everyone for providing your thoughts on how inactive patients should be displayed in Practice Fusion.
As of 03/25/2016, to reduce confusion when working with patient lists, we have made it more obvious in the main Charts section when a patient is inactive.
You will see the words “Inactive” in the patient list as well as the patient header when you are working with an inactive patient.
Additionally, if a patient is marked as inactive, she or he will not appear in search results for appointments, messages, labs, or refills. If you would like a patient to appear in those search results for selection, you’ll need to mark the patient as Active.
Dee Scritchfield
commented
This is a continual issue of making appointments and visits notes on the wrong chart. We really need this differential in place
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
2,569 votesDee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
We would like to hear from other members of our community on how they’d like to see this feature improved as well. Feel free to add your voice to this idea by commenting below. We are listening attentively to every request submitted by our customers.
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
183 votes
Thanks for helping make the Practice Fusion EHR better for everyone. If you are passionate about this idea, remember you can let your colleagues know you support it by clicking the ‘Vote’ button.
The ideas with the most supporters are constantly being considered for addition to our roadmap in the future.
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
78 votes
Thanks for helping make the Practice Fusion EHR better for everyone. If you are passionate about this idea, remember you can let your colleagues know you support it by clicking the ‘Vote’ button.
The ideas with the most supporters are constantly being considered for addition to our roadmap in the future.
Dee Scritchfield
commented
In the event the brand is required, I can see this being helpful but that is seldom the case. The script automatically says that they can substitute the generic which is the law in WV. It requires generic substitution unless otherwise stated. Although the message says prescription was not sent because a prior authorization was needed; this is not accurate. E-scribe has already sent the prescription which is why we know prior authorization is not needed in almost all situations as they automatically fill it using the generic without us having to do anything.
That is why we want the ability to turn this feature off. This law may be different in other states so the feature may be useful to others.Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
Dee Scritchfield
commented
I understand this was made to enhance our work flow but it has merely created additional work for us to clear these from the tasks. We never have this many calls from pharmacies for prior authorization.
-
343 votes
As of 8/20/2015, we are excited to announce that we have deployed Flowsheets and a massive expansion of the types of vital signs that can be entered and viewed longitudinally for patients in the EHR.
You can read about flowsheets and vital sign expansion here: http://knowledgebase.practicefusion.com/knowledgebase/articles/515826-how-do-i-use-flowsheets
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
97 votes
Thanks for helping make the Practice Fusion EHR better for everyone. If you are passionate about this idea, remember you can let your colleagues know you support it by clicking the ‘Vote’ button.
The ideas with the most supporters are constantly being considered for addition to our roadmap in the future.
Dee Scritchfield
commented
This is a very time consuming process and field should populate if it is the same
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
1,011 votes
Thanks for helping make the Practice Fusion EHR better for everyone. If you are passionate about this idea, remember you can let your colleagues know you support it by clicking the ‘Vote’ button.
The ideas with the most supporters are constantly being considered for addition to our roadmap in the future.
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
691 votes
Thanks for helping make the Practice Fusion EHR better for everyone. If you are passionate about this idea, remember you can let your colleagues know you support it by clicking the ‘Vote’ button.
The ideas with the most supporters are constantly being considered for addition to our roadmap in the future.
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
275 votes
As you have probably noticed, you can now manage multiple vital signs, including additional blood pressures for the same encounter, by adding rows and columns to the flowsheet.
You can discover how to add vitals to flowsheets here:
http://knowledgebase.practicefusion.com/knowledgebase/articles/589560Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
-
717 votes
Great idea. We have heard about this from other providers as well.
To anyone else who may be interested in this feature, please add your voice to the conversation by commenting below or by voting for this feature so we know it is important to you. This will improve the likelihood that we add this feature to the Practice Fusion EHR.
Additionally, by voting or commenting here, you’ll receive email updates when others add their voices to the conversation. All of this input goes a long way to helping us shape the feature so it works the best possible way for our providers.
Dee Scritchfield
supported this idea
·
PQRS is what I am working on and looking at a payer of over 300 on a list and not being able print is not feasible because as soon as you link into the patient, you loose the report and have to start over
Practice management and oversight requires that you run a report by the payer mix of a specific provider. We have 15 providers and not being able to look at individual providers is a real barrier